Archive for May, 2012

Vegetable Nutrition – The Root Cause

Posted in Food on May 30, 2012 by David McInerny

You’ve heard that mashed cauliflower is healthier than mashed potatoes. Ok, fine. And you’ve heard that mashed cauliflower tastes just like mashed potatoes. (Long pause.) Uh huh.

Don’t despair about finding healthy veggies that taste great, and let me recommend the lowly turnip. Never bought one? Well, do so, and treat it just like a potato. Once cleaned and peeled, it cuts like a potato, boils like a potato, and even mashes like one. And the best part is that after it is cooked it really, truly tastes like one. Cube turnips and throw them in stew, or boil the cubes until tender and toss with a little butter, salt and fresh parsley. Mash them and top with fat-free beef gravy, and you’ll even fool the kids.

So why not just eat potatoes? Three good reasons: turnips have only one-third of the calories, twice the calcium, and more vitamin C than potatoes. Start by using turnips with potatoes 50/50 in your favorite dishes if you’re still unsure, but I assure you, you’ll soon be buying turnips by the bag.

Lost in Louvre

Posted in Travel on May 29, 2012 by David McInerny

The Louvre is a replete with history, and is sits imposingly along the banks of the Seine.  Its size is overwhelming, inside and out, as is the name.  Walking around the south end of the structure to the glass pyramid that is the entrance, one can’t decide whether to say “Loov” or “Loov-ra.”  Walking down to a well-lit, and surprisingly uncrowded atrium, I purchased tickets for my wife and three kids, and found that there were pictorial directions to the most famous works of art.  It’s impossible to miss Winged Victory at the top of the main set of stairs, although what is so victorious about being armless and decapitated is beyond me.

I have a confession to make, although I suspect I’m not the first.  The museum is so very large, and knowing that one can easily spend days there and not begin to see all of it, we quickly determined to see how long it would take to find and see the Mona Lisa and then gauge our collective energy level to see if we wanted more.  I had last been to the Louvre when I was about sixteen, and I mostly remember it sheer size.  Toting around three kids quickly makes a parent aware that a child’s attention reserved for museums can be limited, yes, even when it is the Louvre in Paris.  So off we trudged, moving fairly well through the manageable crowd, looking for the intermittent little Mona Lisa logos on the wall with arrows pointing the direction, like the treasure hunts of my own youth.  We knew we were getting close as the logos became more frequent, and I tried not to feel too guilty as we breezed past priceless Rembrandt’s and Rubens, telling myself we’d be back someday.  We turned a corner, having navigated through a large portion of the museum toward our goal, when we came smack against a long gallery filled with people who were inching through a tangle of roped walkways reminiscent of the security area of any airport.  So this is where everyone was hiding — at the same place we were.  I’d never felt like such a tourist.

It was a blessing of sorts.  It gave me a chance, as we crawled toward Leonardo’s meisterwerk, to explain what little I remembered of a university art course about Botticelli, El Greco and Rafael.  We had to be careful, though.  If we weren’t constantly attentive as we looked at other works on the wall of the gallery, people and sometimes entire tour groups would attempt (sometimes successfully) to squirt past us in line.  Eventually we turned a corner and there, on the wall to the right, was the most famous smiling countenance in the world.  I was shocked by the small size of the painting, particularly since it commanded the entire wall.  There was a crowd of people, not unlike on the main floor of a rock concert, pushing up to the retaining rope to gaze at the Mona Lisa.  Slowly, those at the front would turn away and make room for the next rush to the front.  We, at long last, found our way to the rope and spent our time admiring Leonardo da Vinci’s work.

When we made our way out of the room, and not a little relieved to escape a mild feeling of claustrophobia, we asked the kids what they thought.  They asked, “Why is it so famous?”  Why, indeed?  One could give a dozen reasons to assure the tots of the painting’s place in the pantheon of enduring art, from the legend of the painting’s feminine subject, to the journeys the painting has made, illicitly and otherwise, around the world.  For our brood, though, it was one very nice painting in the midst of a very big building full of very nice paintings.  So why the hoo-ha over one more than another?  Luckily, I didn’t have to grapple with the question too hard, because as I was leading us out I became hopelessly lost in the Egyptian exhibit, and soon had the whole family occupied with the prospect of spending the night in the Louvre.  After an embarrassing amount of time, I broke the ancient man-code and asked – forgive me – a young lady in uniform for directions out of the building.  After several turns through a few more galleries, we found ourselves back in front of the same young lady who, with a healthy dash of exasperation, personally led us to the exit.  I prefer to recall the afternoon as the one we saw the Mona Lisa and lingered over the relics of ancient Egypt.  After so many exquisite paintings, it becomes as looking at the myriad constellations, but one can never see too many sarcophagi.

The Rolling Stones – Aftermath

Posted in Music with tags , on May 28, 2012 by David McInerny

While the Stones had already released several albums, including “England’s Newest Hitmakers,” “12 x 5,” “The Rollings Stones, Now,” “Out Of Our Heads,” and “December’s Children,” it was 1966’s “Aftermath” that established the Rolling Stones as the legendary band that, even today, legions of fans hope will still release one more album, or at least embark on one final tour. It was with “Aftermath” that the band’s manager, Andrew Oldham, successfully carved the bad boy image he felt would make his boys distinctive in swagger from the clean image (in 1966, anyway) cut by the already globally successful Beatles.

While their previous albums had a few Jagger/Richards penned singles, and some very good ones (“Get Off Of My Cloud,” “Satisfaction”) those earlier albums were laden with R&B covers of U.S. artists. Not so with “Aftermath,” in which every song was written by Mick and Keith, and featured the freshly minted, darker image with such hits as “Paint It Black” and “Under My Thumb.”

U.S. and U.K. versions of the album were released, with the U.K version substituting “Paint It Black” with “Mother’s Little Helper.” The U.K. album cover showed all five band members, not in the stiff poses in vogue at the time, but with the boys assembled casually in front of the camera. Mick Jagger glares icily at the viewer, as if to convey that he, not Brian Jones, would be leading the band from here forward. On the U.S. cover, obviously taken from the same shoot (the band wears the same outfits as the U.K. cover), the band has assembled in different casual poses. Here, all the members look into the camera with the exception of Keith Richards, who looks away and in his turn seems to relate that he too will take the band down a more confrontational path.

This album deserves a fresh listen, as the sound of the Rolling Stones coalesces the grit and spark that would soon unleash a decade of classic hits. Each version of “Aftermath” carries songs not released on the other, so I recommend that you do what I did – get both, and have fun.

Generations

Posted in Family with tags , , , , on May 27, 2012 by David McInerny

May is the month of graduations. Tassels, Sunday afternoon parties, and sudden thoughts of readiness for the next launching point. Relatives begin the bittersweet descent toward the event, envelopes in hand. Parents, grandparents, and a time for looking forward. And backward?

Indeed, yes. As an eighteen-year-old chomps at the bit to begin a four-year sojourn at the University of Kansas, plans are underway for an eightieth birthday party next month. My wife has spent months sifting through dusty Kodak slides  and converting them into digital format with the patient, slavish help of a technical contractor. The results were extraordinary.

The Polish in-laws from South Bend, Indiana gather around the DVD player, and my older son selects big band songs from his iPod as background music (what’s a twenty-year-old doing with that genre on his iPod?). The images, of course, are sublime. They show long ago smiles from celebrations, graduations, dating from the 1940’s through the 1970’s. Grandma in a pill-box hat next to a brand new Studebaker. Her daughter with long, rebellious locks in a college gown, the glint of three future babes in her eyes. My future bride celebrating her first birthday in the house where I first stole a kiss from her fifteen years later.

And my young high school graduate standing next to me, watching intently, realizing possibly that this weekend, while all his, is but one of a long line of graduations, all special, all unique, but ultimately tied to a long string of family celebrations that give the long decades meaning. A continuum of love that will stretch outward to his children and more, long after his graduation Imageday is remembered in some technical format yet to be envisioned.